Welcome to     [ ] Search by Title       Search by Author    
Current Issue
Editors & Editorial Board
Editorial & Business Address
Note fopr Contributors
Library Recommendation Form
Email Alerts
Copyright & Reprint Request
Registered Users







Previous Issues



Administrator Login 


Determining BPL Status: Some Methodological Improvements
Sabina Alkire and Suman Seth
Many have criticized the 2002 Below the Poverty Line methodology used in the rural areas of India to identify eligible beneficiaries. On the one hand, the data were of poor quality and coverage, and were influenced by corruption; on the other hand, the methodology suffered a number of flaws, particularly in treating ordinal data as cardinal, and allowing complete substitutability among all levels of achievement. In order to isolate and scrutinize the methodological points, this article uses the 2005-06 National Family Health Survey (NFHS) dataset, to generate two scores: a pseudo-BPL score, and our preferred score, which we call M0. M0 uses the Adjusted Head Count methodology developed by Alkire and Foster (2007). Not only is the newly proposed methodology able to identify the poor households more effectively, but it also provides additional insights for policy. For example, since the M0 measure can be broken down by dimensions, we can immediately show significant differences in the components of poverty in different states.

Download Full PDF